<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebTrends Outsider &#187; Marketing reporting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/category/banners-sem-ppc-seo-email-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, and pokes, just WebTrends Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:27:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cool data visualization:  Geographic Heat Maps</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2010/cool-data-visualization-geographic-heat-maps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2010/cool-data-visualization-geographic-heat-maps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 16:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[... About Us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Better Geography Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[density maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turn long geographic lists from WebTrends reports into wow-level density contour maps with third party software.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2010/cool-data-visualization-geographic-heat-maps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canonical URLs &#8211; Why You Should Care</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Titles and URLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canonical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spiders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URLs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your site may have a page that can be reached through more than one URL variation - with and without WT.mc_id for example.  This can cause search engine spiders to record more than one URL for that page, and that's a bad thing.  You can prevent the marker parameters (such as WT.mc_id) from being recorded by spiders, by using canonical link-tags.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cool Custom Report:  Campaign latency, pt 1</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Custom Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visitor History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latent conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latent conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitor behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitor history]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Campaign attribution, campaign latency, residual effects, latent conversions, indirect campaign effects, post-campaign effects.  Whatever you want to call it, here are some WebTrends solutions for it.  Part one of several.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cool custom report:  scruffy campaign attribution</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-scruffy-campaign-attribution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-scruffy-campaign-attribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaign attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moldy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partial campaign attribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skanky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tee shirt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visitor history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wt.mc_id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wt.vr.ac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Partial campaign attribution is a holy grail for marketing analysts.  WebTrends has an undocumented way to make some headway.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-scruffy-campaign-attribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Discrepancies between WebTrends and Google AdWords</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/discrepancies-between-webtrends-and-google-adwords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/discrepancies-between-webtrends-and-google-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrepancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC search terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clicks vs visits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[different]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't agree]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To account for the inevitable disrepancies between reports by my main analytics program and Google AdWords (and the other sponsored searches), I've done a lot of research including hit-by-hit comparisons.  Here is my current list of reasons for discrepancies.

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/discrepancies-between-webtrends-and-google-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

