<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool Custom Report:  Campaign latency, pt 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, and pokes, just WebTrends Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:35:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 14:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=112#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>Scott, no, it doesn&#039;t take into account visitor history; it will only filter visits where, in the current visit, there is a WT.mc_id on the entry page.  In other words, visits that came from a campaign today, this same visit.

Did you know that &quot;originally came in through Paid Search&quot; is a possible filter?  Your comment makes me realize we need a post on all the available visitor history campaign variables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, no, it doesn&#8217;t take into account visitor history; it will only filter visits where, in the current visit, there is a WT.mc_id on the entry page.  In other words, visits that came from a campaign today, this same visit.</p>
<p>Did you know that &#8220;originally came in through Paid Search&#8221; is a possible filter?  Your comment makes me realize we need a post on all the available visitor history campaign variables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=112#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>For the &quot;The custom filter that makes it work&quot; section if I create the new filter using the campaign variable does this take into account visitor history?  The reason I ask is I was going to apply the same filter to a report I have built for Natural Search as I am using Most Recent Search Engine Organic as my primary dimension and I know this doesn&#039;t by default exclude someone who may have original come in through Paid Search and then came back to the site Organically.  

I am trying to prevent crossover with Paid and Natural Search</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the &#8220;The custom filter that makes it work&#8221; section if I create the new filter using the campaign variable does this take into account visitor history?  The reason I ask is I was going to apply the same filter to a report I have built for Natural Search as I am using Most Recent Search Engine Organic as my primary dimension and I know this doesn&#8217;t by default exclude someone who may have original come in through Paid Search and then came back to the site Organically.  </p>
<p>I am trying to prevent crossover with Paid and Natural Search</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Mc</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/cool-custom-report-campaign-latency-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1269</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Mc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=112#comment-1269</guid>
		<description>This makes much more sense than what I was getting out of WebTrends before.  Adding that filter changes everything.

And this is much clearer than anything I&#039;ve been reading on campaign latency on a certain other big time analytics guru blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes much more sense than what I was getting out of WebTrends before.  Adding that filter changes everything.</p>
<p>And this is much clearer than anything I&#8217;ve been reading on campaign latency on a certain other big time analytics guru blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

