<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canonical URLs &#8211; Why You Should Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, and pokes, just WebTrends Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:35:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Use Webmaster Tools to Clean Up Organic Search URLs &#124; WebTrends Outsider</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1984</link>
		<dc:creator>Use Webmaster Tools to Clean Up Organic Search URLs &#124; WebTrends Outsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 21:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=154#comment-1984</guid>
		<description>[...] Bing, and Yahoo frequently do have, in their indexes, URLs with campaign parameters.  See our Canonical URLs post for a description of several ways those superfluous parameters sneak into the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bing, and Yahoo frequently do have, in their indexes, URLs with campaign parameters.  See our Canonical URLs post for a description of several ways those superfluous parameters sneak into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=154#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>Mike - any parameter will affect path analysis only if you&#039;ve allowed the parameter to be displayed in reports.  If you&#039;ve specified that the parameter should be suppressed in reports, path analysis will ignore it (the differentiating parameter).  The suppress/display of specific parameters is controlled by WebTrends&#039; &quot;URL Rebuilding&quot; function which is found in the part of the config menu called &quot;Administration.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; any parameter will affect path analysis only if you&#8217;ve allowed the parameter to be displayed in reports.  If you&#8217;ve specified that the parameter should be suppressed in reports, path analysis will ignore it (the differentiating parameter).  The suppress/display of specific parameters is controlled by WebTrends&#8217; &#8220;URL Rebuilding&#8221; function which is found in the part of the config menu called &#8220;Administration.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=154#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>That is a really interesting idea because to the best of my knowledge the hash tag stuff is ignored when a page is indexed.

At the same time, that trick cannot be used in URLs used in paid search, at least not for Google AdWords.  The redirect in Google AdWords will strip out the hash tag portion during the redirect and the visit will not be identified as a paid search visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a really interesting idea because to the best of my knowledge the hash tag stuff is ignored when a page is indexed.</p>
<p>At the same time, that trick cannot be used in URLs used in paid search, at least not for Google AdWords.  The redirect in Google AdWords will strip out the hash tag portion during the redirect and the visit will not be identified as a paid search visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nestor</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Nestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=154#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>I found your site yesterday and it has been very informative. Mad props!

In terms of this post, a possible alternative to not breaking your SEO rankings is implementing tracking your WT parameters via the hash tag instead of adding it to the regular query parameter list. For example, &quot;index.htm#WT.mc_id=cid&quot; instead of &quot;index.htm?WT.mc_id=cid&quot;. This can be done by adding a small snippet of code in your WT base tag to parse the said hash tag parameters and pass it to the page tag image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found your site yesterday and it has been very informative. Mad props!</p>
<p>In terms of this post, a possible alternative to not breaking your SEO rankings is implementing tracking your WT parameters via the hash tag instead of adding it to the regular query parameter list. For example, &#8220;index.htm#WT.mc_id=cid&#8221; instead of &#8220;index.htm?WT.mc_id=cid&#8221;. This can be done by adding a small snippet of code in your WT base tag to parse the said hash tag parameters and pass it to the page tag image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2009/canonical-urls-why-you-should-care/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=154#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>How would the parameter effect the path analysis?  Basically if you had two identical links on the same, would they come up separately in the path analysis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would the parameter effect the path analysis?  Basically if you had two identical links on the same, would they come up separately in the path analysis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

