<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasons for &#8220;Direct Traffic&#8221; in referrer reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/reasons-for-direct-traffic-in-referrers-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/reasons-for-direct-traffic-in-referrers-reports/</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, and pokes, just WebTrends Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:35:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beyond WT.srch &#8212; The Better Way To Track PPC &#124; WebTrends Outsider</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/reasons-for-direct-traffic-in-referrers-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>Beyond WT.srch &#8212; The Better Way To Track PPC &#124; WebTrends Outsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 20:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=9#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>[...] Furthermore, you may not realize that a substantial number of PPC visits have no recorded referrer at all ! In a large site&#8217;s records that we examined recently, Google&#8217;s PPC visits had 19% &#8220;no referrer&#8221; visits; Yahoo topped 12%, and MSN had around 5%.  (Go here for possible reasons for direct traffic visits) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Furthermore, you may not realize that a substantial number of PPC visits have no recorded referrer at all ! In a large site&#8217;s records that we examined recently, Google&#8217;s PPC visits had 19% &#8220;no referrer&#8221; visits; Yahoo topped 12%, and MSN had around 5%.  (Go here for possible reasons for direct traffic visits) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasons for seeing your own site in Referrer reports &#8230; and what you can do about it &#124; WebTrends Outsider</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/reasons-for-direct-traffic-in-referrers-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons for seeing your own site in Referrer reports &#8230; and what you can do about it &#124; WebTrends Outsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=9#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>[...] Page), there are always two puzzling entries &#8211; the Direct Traffic item (see this post about Direct Traffic) and the inevitable listing for your own [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Page), there are always two puzzling entries &#8211; the Direct Traffic item (see this post about Direct Traffic) and the inevitable listing for your own [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Direct Traffic in Google Analytics&#160;&#124;&#160;Soupbo</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/reasons-for-direct-traffic-in-referrers-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-1889</link>
		<dc:creator>Direct Traffic in Google Analytics&#160;&#124;&#160;Soupbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=9#comment-1889</guid>
		<description>[...] were getting to this page, so I did a bit of searching on the topic. First I researched a bit about what direct traffic means. Okay, possibly the referrer information is being suppressed, although if you&#8217;re going to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were getting to this page, so I did a bit of searching on the topic. First I researched a bit about what direct traffic means. Okay, possibly the referrer information is being suppressed, although if you&#8217;re going to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Direkte trafik er ikke direkte trafik &#124; Google Analytics trafikkilder &#124; Webanalytiker.dk</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/reasons-for-direct-traffic-in-referrers-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-1870</link>
		<dc:creator>Direkte trafik er ikke direkte trafik &#124; Google Analytics trafikkilder &#124; Webanalytiker.dk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=9#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>[...] direkte indtastning mv., kan placere et besøg under direkte trafik. Inspireret af indlæggene fra Webtrendsoutsider , Actionable Analytics og VKI studios får du her en række punkter, hvor trafik, du formentlig [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] direkte indtastning mv., kan placere et besøg under direkte trafik. Inspireret af indlæggene fra Webtrendsoutsider , Actionable Analytics og VKI studios får du her en række punkter, hvor trafik, du formentlig [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comprender el tráfico directo en los informes &#124; Analítica Web con WebTrends</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/reasons-for-direct-traffic-in-referrers-reports/comment-page-1/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>Comprender el tráfico directo en los informes &#124; Analítica Web con WebTrends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=9#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>[...] Fuente:  Webtrends Outsider [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fuente:  Webtrends Outsider [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

