<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miscellaneous &#8220;candy jar&#8221; post #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/miscellaneous-candy-jar-post-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/miscellaneous-candy-jar-post-1/</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, and pokes, just WebTrends Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:35:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/miscellaneous-candy-jar-post-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=66#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>Very good point.  We&#039;ve put it on the list!  It&#039;s important to know the four types of form submittals that are covered.  The TagBuilder itself has succinct, programmer-oriented help screens (they now call them information screens apparently) but I think we could use something that&#039;s for the people who talk to the programmers, i.e.  what kinds of form submittal actions don&#039;t get tracked by the tag and what to expect to see in resulting reports.  Thanks for the idea, Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point.  We&#8217;ve put it on the list!  It&#8217;s important to know the four types of form submittals that are covered.  The TagBuilder itself has succinct, programmer-oriented help screens (they now call them information screens apparently) but I think we could use something that&#8217;s for the people who talk to the programmers, i.e.  what kinds of form submittal actions don&#8217;t get tracked by the tag and what to expect to see in resulting reports.  Thanks for the idea, Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BostonMatt</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/miscellaneous-candy-jar-post-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1598</link>
		<dc:creator>BostonMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=66#comment-1598</guid>
		<description>Was there a post created for:
Does WebTrends SDC track form button events (submittals of forms)?  — Yes, the Tag Builder’s advanced tag has code to detect this if your form button uses one of four common submittal actions.  This is probably worth a whole post unless WebTrends already has the documentation for it.  We haven’t checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was there a post created for:<br />
Does WebTrends SDC track form button events (submittals of forms)?  — Yes, the Tag Builder’s advanced tag has code to detect this if your form button uses one of four common submittal actions.  This is probably worth a whole post unless WebTrends already has the documentation for it.  We haven’t checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/miscellaneous-candy-jar-post-1/comment-page-1/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 21:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=66#comment-792</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s right.  They corrected themselves later in the presentation, though, after the main part of the talk.  It sounded like they had a slightly different interpretation of &quot;work with&quot; involving some predefined reports in8 .5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s right.  They corrected themselves later in the presentation, though, after the main part of the talk.  It sounded like they had a slightly different interpretation of &#8220;work with&#8221; involving some predefined reports in8 .5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Daly</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/miscellaneous-candy-jar-post-1/comment-page-1/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Daly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=66#comment-791</guid>
		<description>FWIW - One of the summer &quot;Lunch and Learn&quot; series gave the wrong answer to #19...which versions of WT work with the tagbuilder...based on my testing and experience, the answer you gave is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW &#8211; One of the summer &#8220;Lunch and Learn&#8221; series gave the wrong answer to #19&#8230;which versions of WT work with the tagbuilder&#8230;based on my testing and experience, the answer you gave is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/miscellaneous-candy-jar-post-1/comment-page-1/#comment-787</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=66#comment-787</guid>
		<description>1 - Huge omission on my part!  Thanks, I will change the text of the post.

9 - I thought so too but found my information quite explicit  in the documentation on licensing.  Maybe this deserves a test.

18 -  The info under the question marks is actually pretty good, but yes, it&#039;s still only viewable under the question marks.  I hope that&#039;s because they haven&#039;t yet incorporated it into the pdf-type documentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 &#8211; Huge omission on my part!  Thanks, I will change the text of the post.</p>
<p>9 &#8211; I thought so too but found my information quite explicit  in the documentation on licensing.  Maybe this deserves a test.</p>
<p>18 &#8211;  The info under the question marks is actually pretty good, but yes, it&#8217;s still only viewable under the question marks.  I hope that&#8217;s because they haven&#8217;t yet incorporated it into the pdf-type documentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

