<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool custom report:  What on-site search terms led to an exit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-what-on-site-search-terms-led-to-exit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-what-on-site-search-terms-led-to-exit/</link>
	<description>Tips, tricks, and pokes, just WebTrends Analytics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 18:36:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mini_Cooper_Boy</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-what-on-site-search-terms-led-to-exit/comment-page-1/#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>Mini_Cooper_Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=49#comment-1866</guid>
		<description>I have a On Site Search report success story too. 

After our site redesign (we implemented a CMS) I built the basic OSS custom reports to show the search terms found and not found. Post go live of the CMS and after some sanity checking of the reports i noticed that a couple of key phrases (DMP, IVA) were showing up on the not found terms report. Imposable! i thought our site contains those key words in at least 101 different places (pretty much the core of our business is based around the terms DMP and IVA).

After a quick chat with the Webmaster about the results, it turns out the OSS settings required the search term to be &gt; 3 characters to return any results (not very useful in our case). Changed the OSS settings to be &gt; 2 and bingo clients can now see valid results for those terms.

We would never have known this issue existed without those two little reports :-)

Ta
Simon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a On Site Search report success story too. </p>
<p>After our site redesign (we implemented a CMS) I built the basic OSS custom reports to show the search terms found and not found. Post go live of the CMS and after some sanity checking of the reports i noticed that a couple of key phrases (DMP, IVA) were showing up on the not found terms report. Imposable! i thought our site contains those key words in at least 101 different places (pretty much the core of our business is based around the terms DMP and IVA).</p>
<p>After a quick chat with the Webmaster about the results, it turns out the OSS settings required the search term to be &gt; 3 characters to return any results (not very useful in our case). Changed the OSS settings to be &gt; 2 and bingo clients can now see valid results for those terms.</p>
<p>We would never have known this issue existed without those two little reports <img src='http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ta<br />
Simon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-what-on-site-search-terms-led-to-exit/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=49#comment-1274</guid>
		<description>Good!

A story:  using on-site search analysis, we found a major blunder by the merchandising people --- they thought everybody used the industry term &quot;swimwear&quot; and that&#039;s the only word they used.  They were one of the few sites that sold a wide selection of swimwear year &#039;round so it was important to the winter vacation population.  The on-site search showed additional terms that actually got no search results --- &quot;swim suits&quot; and a couple other regional terms.  They corrected the on-site thesaurus and also widened the vocabulary in the visible text and product names.  In addition to getting the on-site searchers to the right part of the site, the copy changes influenced their external search rankings for those extra terms.  So, business for these products went up two ways.  And the people looking for swimwear also found tropical clothes in the middle of winter, so average sale size increased.

We love internal search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good!</p>
<p>A story:  using on-site search analysis, we found a major blunder by the merchandising people &#8212; they thought everybody used the industry term &#8220;swimwear&#8221; and that&#8217;s the only word they used.  They were one of the few sites that sold a wide selection of swimwear year &#8217;round so it was important to the winter vacation population.  The on-site search showed additional terms that actually got no search results &#8212; &#8220;swim suits&#8221; and a couple other regional terms.  They corrected the on-site thesaurus and also widened the vocabulary in the visible text and product names.  In addition to getting the on-site searchers to the right part of the site, the copy changes influenced their external search rankings for those extra terms.  So, business for these products went up two ways.  And the people looking for swimwear also found tropical clothes in the middle of winter, so average sale size increased.</p>
<p>We love internal search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julian</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-what-on-site-search-terms-led-to-exit/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 09:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=49#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve setup three of your suggested internal site search reports and am expecting them to be very useful! From providing business actionable insight for our site UE team to improving our backend search results and indexing.

Cheers for your blog, been a great start into getting useful results out of Webtrends, as a previous Google Analytics user the change has been a bit painful:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve setup three of your suggested internal site search reports and am expecting them to be very useful! From providing business actionable insight for our site UE team to improving our backend search results and indexing.</p>
<p>Cheers for your blog, been a great start into getting useful results out of Webtrends, as a previous Google Analytics user the change has been a bit painful:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-what-on-site-search-terms-led-to-exit/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=49#comment-1272</guid>
		<description>Julian, Yes, I&#039;d agree!  

So have you found anything interesting or helpful in the report?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian, Yes, I&#8217;d agree!  </p>
<p>So have you found anything interesting or helpful in the report?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julian</title>
		<link>http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/2008/cool-custom-report-what-on-site-search-terms-led-to-exit/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/?p=49#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>Thats great, is now working! :)

I&#039;m getting confused as to which measure is best to put against [site search term] would you suggest that visits is correct?

Visits being the number of times a search terms is used whereas pageviews against a search term is more related to number of pages viewed after a search visit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats great, is now working! <img src='http://www.webtrendsoutsider.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting confused as to which measure is best to put against [site search term] would you suggest that visits is correct?</p>
<p>Visits being the number of times a search terms is used whereas pageviews against a search term is more related to number of pages viewed after a search visit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
